Polizzi IPgram Focused on Highlighting Qualified Candidates for Governance Leaders Edited by the Co-founder of WCCN Publishing, Inc.			Editorial Framework: The role of the USA’s non-elected Governance Leadership is too critical to be subjected singularly to executive branch political selection and senatorial Advise & Consent. It is time for direct electorate involvement -- for an Electorate Advise & Consent process.
Specific Job Swap-out Details: The Case for Dick Cheney to Head Homeland Security The Case for Ken Lewis to Head AIG-Louie Mae	IPgram content serves no Progressive, Conservative, or in-between ideology. Nor are its articles fair and balanced because being balanced generally is incompatible with being fair. Instead, the ideology served is one of championing an eons-developed Code of Civilized Society Governance, modulated by a compass that always points to the morality inculcated in the Theism practiced by our forefathers. Dateline: USA, March 8, 2010 IPgram’s Healthcare Coverage Open Healthcare Message To 30 Specific Congressmen (click here) Should Congressmen Be Obliged to Serve Two Constituencies? (click here) (The Story Behind the Open Healthcare Message) Dateline: USA, February 22, 2010 Concept Introduction: Electorate Advise & Consent Process for Non-elected Governance Leaders To date, we, the electorate, have the ability to elect our political leaders for local, state, and federal offices. A responsibility we carry out with varying degrees of due diligence, all the time allowing ourselves to be inordinately influenced by the outlooks and agendas served to us by the media. At this point in time, no one honestly can disagree that, for the last presidential election, we did an excruciatingly poor job of vetting all the candidates during the primary process. Arguably, if we did proper due diligence during the primaries, and were we not blind-sighted by a biased media determined to exert its will at any cost to the nation, neither of the two primary winners would have been on the ballot. And therefore, we would not have had to choose between two wholly unqualified persons to be our president – inadvertently causing us to select a man based on emotion -- on the salubrious historic event his election would represent. The result has been a dangerous march away from that which made the USA the greatest civilized self-governance society the world has ever known – bar none. Reversing this march, before reaching a point of no return, will not be easy. Consequently, the reversing process cannot wait until it is time to elect a set of replacement political leaders. This is especially true when it comes to homeland and global security, the devastating condition of the economy, and our teetering financial situation. The IPgram maintains we do have a legally actionable option to commence rectifying the ineptitude and power hungry avarice of our elected political leaders. Specifically, to proactively focus on seeking to swap out ill-qualified non-elected leaders who were appointed by our political leaders to formulate and execute governance, but whose inexperience and ideology extremes have literally placed the nation physically and economically in mortal danger. The objective would be to swap them out for uniquely qualified persons. How can we do this? First the concept, and then the method for doing an end-run around the ineffectual political leaders. The concept is for we the people to impose an Advise & Consent process on selecting and installing non-elected governance leaders. A process that authoritatively influences executive branch selection and senatorial Advise & Consent processes for confirming non-elected leaders. And, equally as important, includes a voice in removing said leaders for non-performance. Stated another way, we the people can function somewhat as an executive search agency for our client, the United States government. We’ll start with two critical security and financial positions currently without serious leadership. Yet, all the while there are identifiably highly qualified candidates for these positions. We highlight one uniquely qualified individual to properly fill the top Homeland Security position, and one highly qualified person to become the Chairman & CEO of a combined Fannie Mae & Freddie Mac and AIG. A leader who will bail-out, or more precisely, take the taxpayer off the hook for the financial hemorrhaging these ill-managed entities are sustaining. These two starting points were selected because few in the electorate would not want us to maximize the odds for preserving our lives and homeland – an imperative that preempts everything else. But there is a corollary reason. In order to do his job, a strong person in this position will have to straighten out other very related failings in federal governmental entities, especially within the Justice Department. Likewise, in the process of divesting the government of the likes of Fannie, Freddie. and AIG, a capable leader will tangentially have to be capable of capping the reach of congressional power brokers whose fingerprints are on creating the financial mess that brought us to the financial brink. And, as we will see in a forthcoming article, a derivative of such capping will set the stage for really putting the federal government on a financial diet. It will take all the skills generally possessed by political leaders for the electorate to implement an effective Electorate Advise & Consent process. The hallmark skill being to use specifically crafted tactics for each job we seek to fill with our candidate. Thus, each job we address is done so in a separate article on this website. In each separate article, as appropriate, we provide the job requirements, list the experience a candidate must possess, and then put forward a well-qualified candidate. Then we address how best to achieve the position-specific desired swap-out. Our recommended candidate for the Homeland Security position is Dick Cheney. Suppress the guffaws until you have read the IPgram case. (See left margin above for link to the article “The Case for Dick Cheney to Head Homeland Security”.) Our recommended candidate for Chairman & CEO of the entity we’ll call AIG-Louis Mae is Ken Lewis. Arguably the one man perfectly qualified to pull off the fete, and one who pays his taxes. (See left margin above for link to the article “The Case for Ken Lewis to Head AIG-Louie Mae”.)			Forthcoming Specific Job Swap-out Details The AOL Prescription for Re-introducing Journalistic Standards & Ethics into All Media Forms The Case for John Bolton’s Reconstituted United Nations How Andy Stern’s Unionization Activities in India Will Return Productivity-Competitive Manufacturing & Service Jobs to the USA Selecting a New House Speaker by the Numbers Civilization’s Imperative for a “Thou Shalt Not” Game for the X-Box Generation
	Editor’s Note: The left margin lists job-specific swap-out articles existing on this website. The right margin lists forthcoming job swap-out articles.
Permission to Replicate: Bloggers are permitted to replicate substantive parts of the content on this website provided: a) appropriate attribution is made b) replication remains faithful to the copy’s context and intent		e-Mail Contact Address: IPgram@wccn.com	Polizzi IPgram edited by Thomas A. Polizzi Ponte Vedra Beach, FL